Banca de DEFESA: PABLO HENRIQUE SPÍNDOLA TÔRRES

Uma banca de DEFESA de DOUTORADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
DISCENTE : PABLO HENRIQUE SPÍNDOLA TÔRRES
DATA : 15/08/2018
HORA: 14:00
LOCAL: cpda - 6º andar
TÍTULO:

Neither dust nor cloud: debates on the historicize from Discipline and punish

PALAVRAS-CHAVES:

disconcert, emergence, genealogies

PÁGINAS: 244
GRANDE ÁREA: Ciências Humanas
ÁREA: História
SUBÁREA: Teoria e Filosofia da História
RESUMO:

The proposal was to historicize a debate in which it was proposed to think about how a historian, who reflects from the present, constitutes another way of thinking about the past. The selected debate begins with the publication of the book Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison (“Surveiller et punir: naissance de la prison”), published in 1975 by Michel Foucault.This text had a critical review by the historian, also french, Jacques Léonard called L’historien et le philosophe - A propos de: Surveiller et punir: naissance de la prison. The review was answered in a text called The dust and the cloud (La poussière et le nuage), written by Michel Foucault and was unfolded in a meeting between them and some more historians in a round table of May 20, 1978 (Table ronde du 20 mai 1978).The research was divided into three chapters, in the first was addressed the two texts that began the debate in an attempt to resume their arguments and understand with them were being conducted in perspectives that can be associated with a broader debate. Then relations were made with other debates that were taking place in France and a relation with the theoretical traditions with which the two thinkers can be associated.In the second chapter, a survey was made about Jacques Léonard, trying to locate his researches in the scene of the history of French medicine and its assumptions. Just as the theoretical positions that marked the way Foucault deal with history, especially with regard to genealogies. Genealogies were historicized as tactics employed by Foucault in dealing with history and thought of in the plural, attempted to account for the diversity of approaches they engender.In this sense, it was necessary to resume the discussions in several writings, lectures, conferences and classes, at the time of writing the book Discipline and punish. The third chapter focused on the book, as the research sought to see how Foucault's successive theoretical shifts were rearranging until they arrived in the book itself.The idea was to try to perceive the writings in movement and not to establish in them an exegetical truth, to next address the arguments contained in Discipline and punish. The arguments presented in the book were mapped to relate them to the debate that unfolded in the texts of Léonard and Foucault.The last part of the text was dedicated to Table ronde du 20 mai 1978, the concern was to perceive between the participants, their respective positions in relation to the history and how at that moment the discussion ceased to be about the book of Foucault and happened to be about the historical knowledge.The research turned to the considerations raised in the debates, especially in what, somehow, seemed to be more uncomfortable to the debaters when problematizing or historicizing. Two positions in particular: the way Foucault thinks about his methods, especially with regard to the approach to genealogies; and how he deals with the notion of happening and the implications of this in his way of write history.

 

MEMBROS DA BANCA:
Externo à Instituição - ANDRÉ CONSTANTINO YAZBEK - UFF
Externo à Instituição - CARLOS EDUARDO FREIRE ESTELLITA-LINS - UERJ
Presidente - 1171508 - JOSE NICOLAO JULIAO
Externo ao Programa - 1797577 - LEANDRO PINHEIRO CHEVITARESE
Interno - 1734363 - REBECA GONTIJO TEIXEIRA