Banca de DEFESA: LIZ DENIZE CARVALHO PAIVA

Uma banca de DEFESA de DOUTORADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
DISCENTE : LIZ DENIZE CARVALHO PAIVA
DATA : 13/12/2018
HORA: 13:00
LOCAL: Instituto de Educação
TÍTULO:

Institutional Evaluation and the Challenges of Formative Evaluation at the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology

 

PALAVRAS-CHAVES:

Keywords: Institutional Evaluation; Regulation; Formative Evaluation; Federal Institute.

 

PÁGINAS: 235
GRANDE ÁREA: Ciências Humanas
ÁREA: Educação
SUBÁREA: Planejamento e Avaliação Educacional
ESPECIALIDADE: Avaliação de Sistemas, Instituições, Planos e Programas Educacionais
RESUMO:

ABSTRACT

PAIVA, Liz Denize Carvalho. Institutional Evaluation and the Challenges of Formative Evaluation at the 

Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology. 2018. Thesis (Doctorate in Education). Institute

 of Education / Multidisciplinary Institute, PPGEduc / Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica,

 RJ. 2018. 

The thesis deals with the studies of the institutional evaluation in the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology, observing the challenges of the formative evaluation. The importance of participatory action by the academic community in the process of institutional evaluation was a motivating factor in the initial reflection of the research. The study was characterized by a basic descriptive and qualitative research. The general objective was to analyze the institutional evaluation process in the Federal Institutes, taking as object of study the Goiano Federal Institute, based on the formative and regulatory vision defined in the National System of Evaluation of Higher Education (SINAES), in the period of 2015 to 2017. The theoretical research was developed with reference in the conceptual, historical, regulatory, political-social and educational assumptions of the process of institutional evaluation. Documentary research focused on the SINAES and the dialogic contexts of the FIs, enabling the characterization of the expansion of this institution, adopting as a central axis the higher education. The research allowed us to discuss the evaluation policies implemented in the FIs, and was substantiated by the detailed analysis of one of them, the Goiano IF, taken as a sample in this study. The choice of the institution was due to the fact that in the delimited period it was the only Institute to obtain an institutional concept "5", considered of excellence in the evaluation of institutional re-creation. The main theoretical references chosen to deepen the categories of analysis, received the treatment indicated by the critical-dialectical method considered the most appropriate because it covers the contradictions of reality, the dialogical aspects, the totality and the movements of continuous transformation. The aim was to systematize the evaluation of IF Goiano, considering its equivalence to the federal universities and the results of the process of internal and external institutional evaluation, focusing on the axis called "planning and institutional evaluation" of SINAES. The research used bibliographical sources, documentaries, field observation and the application of questionnaires to the key informants. These were made up of members of the Evaluation Committee and the Subcommittees of the campuses, managers and technical-administrative servants. The study deepened the understanding of the perception of the target public regarding the process of institutional evaluation, in the concepts of regulation and formative evaluation. The main contribution of the research was the analysis of the evaluation experience of a newly created institution in the scenario of higher education - the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology. The research, taking as a sample the IF Goiano, concluded that the process of institutional evaluation has been developing according to the molds of the regulation envisaged in the SINAES, to the detriment of the conception of formative evaluation. The thesis also showed that the evaluation culture and the understanding of the importance of this process still present as a challenge to be achieved by the FIs, as well as the necessary adequacy of the SINAES in order to meet the specificities of these institutions.

MEMBROS DA BANCA:
Presidente - 1060677 - CELIA REGINA OTRANTO
Externo à Instituição - DEISE MANCEBO - UERJ
Externo à Instituição - JANE RANGEL ALVES BARBOSA - UNIFOA
Externo à Instituição - JOSÉ VIEIRA DE SOUSA - UnB
Externo ao Programa - 1067747 - NADIA MARIA PEREIRA DE SOUZA