Banca de DEFESA: LEONARDO RIBEIRO GONÇALVES DE OLIVEIRA

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : LEONARDO RIBEIRO GONÇALVES DE OLIVEIRA
DATE: 01/10/2020
TIME: 09:00
LOCAL: Google Meet
TITLE:

About the CREAS follow-up to children victims of sexual abuse: a study based in Ferenczi

KEY WORDS:

Trauma Theory, Child Abuse, Public Policy

PAGES: 151
BIG AREA: Ciências Humanas
AREA: Psicologia
SUMMARY:

This research aims to address how a case of a child victim of sexual abuse attended by CREAS in a medium-sized municipality in the state of Rio de Janeiro was followed up. The Ferenczian theory of trauma was used as a reference for analysis, and special attention was given to the dilemmas caused by two apparently contradictory demands, namely: the demand for verification of the facts of abuse and that for the protection of the infant, they were called in the present research double-demand. This paradoxical requirement creates the risk that the question about the veracity of the child's report outweighs the demand for child protection and for meeting their needs.To carry out the research, a qualitative methodology was used that included a first moment of bibliographic review and, then, the study of a single case according to the foundations of the revealing case. During the bibliographic review, we sought to deepen the concept of trauma in Ferenczi using the scene of the disauthorization of distressing experiences as a magnifying glass. That is a Fundamental scene for traumatization, whose emphasis in the relational field produces an expansion of the Freudian clinical direction of psychic elaboration, since it allows the inclusion of an ethical discussion about the other actors in the abusive scene. It was found that one of the functions of CREAS is to produce the opposite of disauthorization, that is, the social recognition of vulnerability, which in children is manifested by the relationship of extreme dependence on adults. In the case investigated, it was found that although CREAS is a device whose emphasis is the function of recognizing vulnerability, it seems to be difficult to fully achieve this objective without meeting the ethical imperative of trying to objectively repair, to the extent possible, the losses of vulnerable subjects who experience abusive relationships. In addition, it was observed that in order to build a more accurate and effective reparation initiative for the case examined, some approximation to the facts was necessary. In view of the need to approximate the facts in the specific case, it was concluded that it is not appropriate to split the double demand definitively in order to determine which is pertinent to CREAS and which is not. It seems to be appropriate to think of ways to receive this paradoxical requirement with the help of the protection network, based on a methodology centered on the concrete case, without allowing itself to be tutored by the Justice System and taking care that this does not annul the CREAS's power to produce priority the social recognition of the suffering of subjects in situations of vulnerability.

BANKING MEMBERS:
Interna - 090.796.467-25 - FERNANDA CANAVEZ DE MAGALHAES - UFRJ
Externo à Instituição - LEONARDO CARDOSO PORTELA CÂMARA
Externo à Instituição - JULIO SERGIO VERZTMAN