Banca de DEFESA: ISABEL CRISTINA DA SILVA GONÇALVES

Uma banca de DEFESA de MESTRADO foi cadastrada pelo programa.
STUDENT : ISABEL CRISTINA DA SILVA GONÇALVES
DATE: 15/09/2020
TIME: 14:00
LOCAL: Plataforma RNP
TITLE:

ARGUMENTATIVE LEVELS AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF CRITICAL THINKING: ARGUMENTATIVE STRATEGIES AS A RESOURCE FOR ARGUMENTATION IN THE PRODUCTION OF THE GENRE OPINION ARTICLE OF STUDENTS OF THE 9th YEAR OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

KEY WORDS:

Argumentation, argumentative strategies, opinion piece, critical thinking.

PAGES: 163
BIG AREA: Lingüística, Letras e Artes
AREA: Letras
SUMMARY:

This research aims to contribute to the teaching of Portuguese through a pedagogical intervention that encompasses the role of argumentation in writing classes as a way to foster the critical thinking of students in the 9th grade of elementary school of a public school in the city of Rio de Janeiro, focusing specifically on how argumentative strategies as a resource for argumentation in the production of gender opinion article , in order to reveal authors capable of convincing their interlocutors through a well-grounded critical positioning. In order to realize that argumentation is an important pillar for the construction of critical thinking, the research concentrates its studies on the selection of facts and information that support a point of view. Therefore, it is based on the hypothesis that the mechanisms involved in the act of arguing: the formulation of arguments, the consideration of opposing arguments / the formulation of counter-arguments and the final response to the opposition are the basis for learning writing, as students appropriate the discourse, defending their views. In relation to the pedagogical organization of work, supported by haydt's guidelines (2011), a didactic unit was planned for the applied evaluations. As a starting point for the work with argumentation in the school, we will present investigations of the argumentation in the school based on theorists such as Lipman (1995) and Leitão (2011). The analysis of the productions, within an enunciative and interactionist perspective of the language, sought to highlight the discursive resources employed by the student subjects to construct the argumentation following the guidelines of Passareli (2012). To better understand, the use of argumentative resources, the New Rhetoric of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca (1996) The results of the research show that there is a direct relationship between the choice of theoretical subsidies for the performance of pedagogical work and the improvement in the quality of the students' writing. It was possible to perceive advances in the organization and productivity in the texts produced after the specific pedagogical proposals applied on the theme addressed. Thus, it is expected that this work will contribute to the teaching of argumentation in opinion articles in a significant way, as well as to the stimulation of critical thinking on subjects that place students as citizens capable of seeing social transformation through the written text, which leaves an openness for teaching professionals to feel motivated, from the results of this research , to give continuity complexity that involves the work with argumentation.

BANKING MEMBERS:
Externa à Instituição - DEISE CRISTINA DE MORAES PINTO - UFRJ
Presidente - 1449160 - GERSON RODRIGUES DA SILVA
Interno - 1328759 - GILSON COSTA FREIRE